Thursday, Sep 18, 2014
World History Served Up Daily
Further And Better Particulars
An example of an insufficiently particularised allegation in a pleading might be:
- "Between the months of June and August, the Plaintiff repeatedly complained to members of the Defendant's family that the Defendant's family's dogs were trespassing on his property."
If the Defendant was aware of only two complaints that the Plaintiff had made to his wife, which related to a dog otherwise unconnected with the lawsuit, the Defendant would be very unwise to admit the allegation. Similarly, to either "not admit" or deny the allegation would invite a finding against himself on that point, and may lead to an award of costs. Accordingly, the Defendant could reasonably ask for the allegation to be better particularised so that he may plead to it properly.
A request for further and better particulars of the example above might read:
- "Of "Between the months of June and August, the Plaintiff repeatedly complained to members of the Defendant's family that the Defendant's family's dogs were trespassing on his property", please state:
:# On how many occasions the Plaintiff alleges he complained as aforesaid;
:# When, during the months of June, July and August, the complaints were alleged to have been made;
:# Whether the complaints alleged to have been made were made orally, in writing or otherwise;
:# To which members of the Plaintiff's family the complaints are alleged to have been made; and
:# Whether the Plaintiff avers that the complaints or any of them were made with respect to the dog which the Plaintiff alleges bit him.
If the respondent to the request believes that the allegation was sufficiently particularised, and that the requesting party is simply fishing for more information or just being difficult, they would issue a short reply: "Not entitled" or "Sufficiently pleaded".
Some of the content on this page has been obtained from the Further and better particulars
page on Wikipedia and used under the CC-BY-SA
. - Serving History pages are not affiliated with, or endorsed by, anyone associated with the sources of this content